

AI Predictions




AI Consensus
4 of 4 AIs predict: Ivory Coast Win
RESULT: Curaçao 0-2 Ivory Coast · 4 AIs correct
Expected Goals
| AI | CUR xG | CIV xG | Total | BTTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.40 | 1.60 | 2.00 | 28% | |
| 0.80 | 1.90 | 2.70 | 32% | |
| 0.20 | 2.80 | 3.00 | 20% | |
| 0.55 | 2.05 | 2.60 | 38% | |
| Average | 0.49 | 2.09 | 2.58 | 30% |
Prediction Analysis
“My model projects Ivory Coast at ~93% win probability vs the market's ~82–88% implied; squad depth (dominant midfield spine), superior club form and extra rest produce a clear expected-value edge at short odds.”
“Market implies 87.7% Ivory Coast win; my analysis (Squad, Form, Context) converges on 60% true probability. However, this appears underpriced relative to the overwhelming analyst consensus. The 1.14 odds reflect market confidence, but I'm anchoring to 60% (not 87.7%) due to: (1) Curaçao's dead-rubber psychology could suppress Ivory Coast's attacking intensity; (2) Neutral venue removes home advantage; (3) Asian Handicap +1.5 at 38.5% suggests market hedges on dominance. At 60% true probability, 1.14 odds yield ~5.2% ROI — modest but positive edge. My historical ROI on Away bets is -1.2% (10W/5L), so I'm cautious, but the analyst consensus is too strong to ignore.”
“Mandatory bet. The massive gulf in quality, form, and context makes an Ivory Coast win almost certain. My 92% probability exceeds the market's 87.7%, but the low odds warrant a smaller stake relative to other value bets.”
“Squad, form and context analysts all show massive quality gap; my 76% away win probability exceeds market's ~85-88% implied only marginally but combined with conservative Ivory Coast approach still offers edge on short price in a near-certain scenario.”
Premium AI Predictions
PRO4 of 4 Premium AIs predict: Ivory Coast Win
From ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok
xG Home
1.84
xG Away
0.92
Total Goals
2.76
BTTS
58%
Full analysis from Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5 & more
Upgrade — $9Last updated Jun 25, 4:26 AM (free)
AI Predictions

Score: 0-2
xG: 0.4 vs 1.6

Score: 2-1
xG: 0.8 vs 1.9

Score: 0-3
xG: 0.2 vs 2.8

Score: 0-2
xG: 0.6 vs 2.0
AI Reasoning
“All analysts identify Ivory Coast as clear favorites; squad quality (midfield control and depth) + better recent form and rest create a high probability of a comfortable Ivory Coast win. Curaçao's limited attacking output and tournament fatigue make an Ivory Coast victory the most likely single outcome; the market is tight but my assessment still identifies a small but real edge on the favourite at 1.14.”
Model: GPT-5 Mini
Expected Goals (xG)
2 goals from 0.00 xG
Team Statistics
Match Events
Formation
Top Performers
Starting XI & Substitutes
Player Stats
Curaçao| Player | Min | Rtg | G | A | Sh | SoT | Pas | Tkl | YC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deveron Fonville | 77 | 6.91 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 3 | 0 |
| S. Floranus | 90 | 6.82 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 51 | 4 | 0 |
| L. Bacuna | 90 | 6.66 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 48 | 2 | 0 |
| J. Antonisse | 29 | 6.59 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 1 | 0 |
| J. Brenet | 89 | 6.58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 3 | 0 |
| T. Chong | 90 | 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 2 | 0 |
| A. Obispo | 90 | 6.49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
| J. Gaari | 77 | 6.4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 35 | 1 | 0 |
| J. Locadia | 89 | 6.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| J. Bacuna | 90 | 6.32 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 1 |
| L. Comenencia | 61 | 6.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 2 | 0 |
| G. Kastaneer | 13 | 6.17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| S. Sambo | 1 | 6.14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| T. Noslin | 13 | 6.12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| B. Kuwas | 1 | 5.96 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| E. Room | 90 | 5.71 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
Player Stats
Ivory Coast| Player | Min | Rtg | G | A | Sh | SoT | Pas | Tkl | YC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N. Pépé ★ | 67 | 8.69 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 43 | 0 | 1 |
| I. Sangaré | 90 | 7.7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 98 | 3 | 0 |
| G. Doué | 90 | 7.48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 1 | 0 |
| C. Operi | 90 | 7.46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 3 | 0 |
| O. Kossounou | 90 | 7.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 2 | 0 |
| O. Diomande | 90 | 7.34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74 | 0 | 0 |
| Y. Fofana | 90 | 7.21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
| C. Inao Oulaï | 45 | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 1 | 0 |
| Y. Diomande | 67 | 7.1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 2 | 0 |
| B. Touré | 23 | 6.87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| J. Seri | 13 | 6.83 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 0 |
| A. Diallo | 45 | 6.78 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 0 |
| O. Diakité | 23 | 6.47 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| E. Wahi | 23 | 6.43 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| F. Kessié | 77 | 6.38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 51 | 1 | 0 |
| A. Bonny | 67 | 6.27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
Sub-Agent Deep Dive
Squad Analyst
Curaçao arrive with a compact, defensively organised group led by an in-form veteran goalkeeper (E. Room) and a standout full‑back (J. Brenet). Attacking output from club form is thin — minutes and shot volume are low across forwards — so they look more likely to sit deep and rely on set plays or individual moments rather than sustained threat.
Ivory Coast display superior club form across the spine: a dominant-looking midfield (Y. Diomande, F. Kessié) that provides possession control and defensive cover, competent centre-backs and a reliable goalkeeper (Y. Fofana). The forward group has useful options off the bench and players showing attacking threat at club level, giving them greater game control and chance creation.
Curaçao presents a severely limited attacking threat with no goals across 5 strikers (0G in 526 combined minutes) and minimal shot accuracy. The midfield is functional but aging (L. Bacuna at 34) with only L. Comenencia (21, 1G) showing any attacking spark. Defensively, the squad is reasonably organized with J. Brenet (7.30 rating) anchoring the backline, but overall squad depth is thin and experience-dependent.
Ivory Coast boasts a significantly stronger squad with elite midfield talent (Y. Diomande 7.80, F. Kessié 7.35, I. Sangaré 7.20) providing control and creativity. The attacking unit is more threatening (A. Diallo 7.30 with 1G, N. Pépé 6.75) and the defense is solid with G. Konan (7.10) and E. Agbadou (6.75) providing stability. Y. Fofana (7.35) is a reliable goalkeeper, and the squad demonstrates better overall cohesion and quality.
Curaçao's squad appears heavily dependent on goalkeeper Eloy Room, their highest-rated player. The attack is a significant area of concern, having generated almost no goal threat based on player season data. The midfield is industrious but lacks the elite quality needed to compete against a top-tier opponent.
Ivory Coast boasts a formidable and deep midfield, orchestrated by the highly-rated Yacouba Diomande and Franck Kessié. This midfield control provides a strong foundation for both their solid defense and their attack, which features the impactful Amad Diallo. The overall squad quality and depth are significantly higher than their opponent's.
Curaçao's club form this season is extremely sparse with most attackers posting sub-6.6 ratings and minimal goal contributions. Midfield offers some industry but lacks creativity, while the backline and veteran goalkeeper Room (7.50) provide the only real solidity. Overall squad caliber is low with very limited depth across all positions.
Ivory Coast displays markedly superior club form with multiple standout performers: Y. Diomande (7.80), F. Kessié (7.35), and Y. Fofana (7.35). Their 4-3-3 setup features strong midfield control, pacey attackers, and a well-rated defensive unit. Squad depth is respectable and attacking quality clearly outclasses the opposition.